An important strategy for managing thoughts is called "reframing." A person who uses this strategy works to balance their way of thinking so that it is not overly negative. This requires three key steps:
- Identify the negative thoughts.
- Challenge the negative thoughts.
- Develop alternative thoughts.
We have already discussed negative thoughts, so now we will focus on challenging the negative thoughts and developing alternatives.
When we ask individuals to challenge negative thoughts, we start by asking them to tell us about the evidence or proof for the thought they are having. It is important to consider both the evidence that supports the thought and the evidence that challenges the thought. For example, in the case of the catastrophic thought that, "The rain will never stop," a person would provide evidence about rain, such as how long it has rained, when last it did not rain, and any evidence that supports the belief that it will rain forever.
The next step is to come up with different, more accurate thoughts based on other evidence that is being ignored or forgotten. If the person in the rain example noticed that: (a) it has rained for six straight days, but (b) it was sunny before that, (c) it is a rainy time of year, and (d) it rained for 11 straight days at this time last year before there was a sunny day, they could come up with a more balanced thought. A more accurate thought could be, "Even though it feels like the rain will never stop, it is actually common for it to rain a lot this time of year. It will eventually stop raining." This way of thinking has the benefit of being more accurate and less emotionally upsetting. Training yourself to use these more balanced thoughts as automatic thoughts can reduce emotional negatively and thus lessen symptom intensity.
Here are some examples of reframing that relate to coping with pain:
Sonya is having a difficult day with her pain. She thinks, "This pain is going to ruin my life."
When asked for the evidence for this, Sonya notes that she had to cancel some plans yesterday because of her pain. However, she describes another recent day, with similar pain, where she was able to make different choices that allowed her to follow through with her plans for the day.
Sonya recognizes that an alternative thought could be, "Although my pain got in the way yesterday, I am also able to find ways to keep it from getting in the way like pacing and using relaxation methods."
Relative to the original thought, Sonya feels more confident in her ability to manage her pain.
Michelle's physical functioning has changed as a result of her pain. She states, "Because of my pain, I am no longer able to be a good parent."
Michelle started by noting a number of things she was unable to do recently around the home. She admits these limitations are the reason for this thought. When pressed to think of ways she has contributed to her family as a parent, she lists many things: she helped her daughter with her homework; she read to her son before bedtime; and, she made decisions with her partner about an upcoming birthday party.
As a result, Michelle recognizes that, "Although I cannot do some of the things for my family I was able to do before, I make many important contributions to raising my children."
Relative to the original thought, Michelle feels better about her parenting.
It is important to know what reframing does and does not accomplish. Reframing is not about creating an artificially positive or fake scenario. Just as we do not want people blowing negative thoughts out of proportion, we do not want anyone to pretend everything is fine when it is not. Instead, reframing is really about having thoughts that more accurately reflect the evidence. Most importantly, this more balanced prediction typically means thinking about a better, or at least "less negative" outcome.